fiche vs Password Pusher
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fiche
Terminal pastebin server powered by netcat
VS
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
| Feature | fiche | Password Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,547 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, termbin | — |
Why pick each one
Choose fiche if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is fiche or Password Pusher better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while fiche is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fiche and Password Pusher free and open-source?
Yes. fiche is licensed under MIT and Password Pusher under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fiche and Password Pusher with Docker?
fiche: check the project docs for container support. Password Pusher: yes.