BinPastes vs fiche
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BinPastes
Minimal pastebin supporting client-side encryption, fulltext search,
VS
fiche
Terminal pastebin server powered by netcat
| Feature | BinPastes | fiche |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18 | ★ 1,547 |
| First released | 2025 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com, termbin |
Why pick each one
Choose BinPastes if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose fiche if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is BinPastes or fiche better?
fiche is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider BinPastes if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are BinPastes and fiche free and open-source?
Yes. BinPastes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fiche under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BinPastes and fiche with Docker?
BinPastes: check the project docs for container support. fiche: check the project docs for container support.