ByteStash vs Cryptgeon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ByteStash
Pastebin and file storage service with a simple web interface
VS
Cryptgeon
Encrypted note and file sharing with self-destruct
| Feature | ByteStash | Cryptgeon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,514 | ★ 1,497 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret |
Why pick each one
Choose ByteStash if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Cryptgeon if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is ByteStash or Cryptgeon better?
Neither is universally better. ByteStash has the larger community, while Cryptgeon is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ByteStash and Cryptgeon free and open-source?
Yes. ByteStash is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Cryptgeon under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ByteStash and Cryptgeon with Docker?
ByteStash: yes. Cryptgeon: yes.