Chiyogami vs Cryptgeon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chiyogami
Pastebin with API, client-side encryption, user accounts, syntax
VS
Cryptgeon
Encrypted note and file sharing with self-destruct
| Feature | Chiyogami | Cryptgeon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | HTML | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 79 | ★ 1,497 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret |
Why pick each one
Choose Chiyogami if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in HTML
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Cryptgeon if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Chiyogami or Cryptgeon better?
Cryptgeon is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Chiyogami if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Chiyogami and Cryptgeon free and open-source?
Yes. Chiyogami is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Cryptgeon under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chiyogami and Cryptgeon with Docker?
Chiyogami: yes. Cryptgeon: yes.