fiche vs Cryptgeon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fiche
Terminal pastebin server powered by netcat
VS
Cryptgeon
Encrypted note and file sharing with self-destruct
| Feature | fiche | Cryptgeon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,547 | ★ 1,497 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, termbin | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret |
Why pick each one
Choose fiche if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Choose Cryptgeon if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is fiche or Cryptgeon better?
Neither is universally better. fiche has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are fiche and Cryptgeon free and open-source?
Yes. fiche is licensed under MIT and Cryptgeon under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fiche and Cryptgeon with Docker?
fiche: check the project docs for container support. Cryptgeon: yes.