OramaCore vs Stork
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OramaCore
Full-text, vector and hybrid search engine
VS
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
| Feature | OramaCore | Stork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 258 | ★ 2,758 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Elasticsearch | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose OramaCore if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is OramaCore or Stork better?
Stork is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OramaCore if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OramaCore and Stork free and open-source?
Yes. OramaCore is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OramaCore and Stork with Docker?
OramaCore: yes. Stork: check the project docs for container support.