OpenKM Community vs OpenPaper.work
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenKM Community
Enterprise document management and content platform
VS
OpenPaper.work
Personal document scanner and indexer for paperless homes
| Feature | OpenKM Community | OpenPaper.work |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 2,400 |
| First released | 2006 | 2014 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, SharePoint | Evernote |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenKM Community if…
- Comprehensive enterprise features
- Mature platform
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenKM Community or OpenPaper.work better?
OpenPaper.work is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenKM Community if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenKM Community and OpenPaper.work free and open-source?
Yes. OpenKM Community is licensed under GPL-2.0 and OpenPaper.work under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenKM Community and OpenPaper.work with Docker?
OpenKM Community: yes. OpenPaper.work: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- OpenKM Community vs Aleph
- OpenPaper.work vs Aleph
- OpenKM Community vs Alfresco Community Edition
- OpenKM Community vs Ambar
- OpenPaper.work vs Ambar
- OpenKM Community vs Archivematica
- OpenPaper.work vs Archivematica
- OpenKM Community vs BentoPDF
- OpenPaper.work vs BentoPDF
- OpenKM Community vs Collabora Online
- OpenPaper.work vs Collabora Online