Archivematica vs OpenPaper.work
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Archivematica
Digital preservation system for long-term archives
VS
OpenPaper.work
Personal document scanner and indexer for paperless homes
| Feature | Archivematica | OpenPaper.work |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 512 | ★ 2,400 |
| First released | 2010 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Preservica | Evernote |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Archivematica or OpenPaper.work better?
OpenPaper.work is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Archivematica if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Archivematica and OpenPaper.work free and open-source?
Yes. Archivematica is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenPaper.work under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Archivematica and OpenPaper.work with Docker?
Archivematica: check the project docs for container support. OpenPaper.work: check the project docs for container support.