Aleph vs Archivematica
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Aleph
Search and document management for investigative work
VS
Archivematica
Digital preservation system for long-term archives
| Feature | Aleph | Archivematica |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,412 | ★ 512 |
| First released | 2016 | 2010 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, Relativity | Preservica |
Why pick each one
Choose Aleph if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Aleph or Archivematica better?
Neither is universally better. Aleph has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Aleph and Archivematica free and open-source?
Yes. Aleph is licensed under MIT and Archivematica under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Aleph and Archivematica with Docker?
Aleph: yes. Archivematica: check the project docs for container support.