Backup tool nono Plakar vs Restic
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
VS
Restic
Fast, secure, efficient backup program
| Feature | Backup tool nono Plakar | Restic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | ISC | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,013 | ★ 35,412 |
| First released | 2021 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Backblaze, Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Backup tool nono Plakar or Restic better?
Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Backup tool nono Plakar and Restic free and open-source?
Yes. Backup tool nono Plakar is licensed under ISC and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backup tool nono Plakar and Restic with Docker?
Backup tool nono Plakar: yes. Restic: yes.