BackupPC vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackupPCRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguagePerlGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 1,621★ 35,412
First released20012015
ReplacesCrashPlan, Time MachineBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose BackupPC if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Perl
BackupPC details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is BackupPC or Restic better?

Restic is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider BackupPC if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are BackupPC and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. BackupPC is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BackupPC and Restic with Docker?

BackupPC: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons