Backrest vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 35,412
First released20242015
ReplacesBackblazeBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Backrest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backrest and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Restic with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons