SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Timeshift

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption VS TI Timeshift System restore tool for Linux using snapshots
FeatureBackblaze alt Kopia-UI StandaloneTimeshift
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustVala
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 500★ 4,219
First released20202014
ReplacesTime Machine, BackblazeTime Machine, System Restore

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Choose Timeshift if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (4.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Vala
Timeshift details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone or Timeshift better?

Neither is universally better. Timeshift has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Timeshift free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Timeshift under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Timeshift with Docker?

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support. Timeshift: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons