SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Rustic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption VS RU Rustic Fast encrypted deduplicated backup compatible with Restic
FeatureBackblaze alt Kopia-UI StandaloneRustic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 500★ 3,170
First released20202022
ReplacesTime Machine, BackblazeBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Choose Rustic if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Rustic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone or Rustic better?

Neither is universally better. Rustic has the larger community, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Rustic free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Rustic under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Rustic with Docker?

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support. Rustic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons