Backrest vs Rustic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestRustic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 3,170
First released20242022
ReplacesBackblazeBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Rustic if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Rustic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Rustic better?

Backrest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rustic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Backrest and Rustic free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Rustic under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Rustic with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Rustic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons