SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption VS RE Restic Fast, secure, efficient backup program
FeatureBackblaze alt Kopia-UI StandaloneRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 500★ 35,412
First released20202015
ReplacesTime Machine, BackblazeBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Restic with Docker?

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons