SHSelfHostIndex

Medama vs Offen Fair Web Analytics

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Medama Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies VS OF Offen Fair Web Analytics Transparent, fair web analytics that respects users
FeatureMedamaOffen Fair Web Analytics
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score74 · Good46 · Fair
CategoryWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 645★ 981
First released20242019
ReplacesGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Analytics

What are Medama and Offen Fair Web Analytics?

Medama

Medama is a lightweight, privacy-focused website analytics tool that operates without cookies and complies with privacy regulations. It is designed to be fast and simple to self-host.

  • Cookieless tracking
  • SQLite storage
  • Lightweight script
  • Privacy compliant

Offen Fair Web Analytics

Offen Fair Web Analytics is a privacy-focused analytics tool that gives website operators insights while letting visitors see and delete their own data. It is transparent and consent-based.

  • Visitor data transparency
  • End-to-end encrypted data
  • Consent-based tracking
  • Users can delete their data

Medama vs Offen Fair Web Analytics: key differences

Medama is written in Go, while Offen Fair Web Analytics is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — MIT for Medama versus Apache-2.0 for Offen Fair Web Analytics. Medama is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Offen Fair Web Analytics. Offen Fair Web Analytics is the more established project (first released 2019), while Medama arrived in 2024.

Why pick each one

Choose Medama if…

  • Easy single-binary deploy
  • Very lightweight

Watch out for

  • Newer project
  • Smaller feature set
Medama details

Choose Offen Fair Web Analytics if…

  • Exceptionally privacy-respecting
  • Builds visitor trust

Watch out for

  • Less mainstream
  • Consent UI changes metrics
Offen Fair Web Analytics details

Frequently asked questions

Is Medama or Offen Fair Web Analytics better?

Neither is universally better. Offen Fair Web Analytics has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Medama and Offen Fair Web Analytics free and open-source?

Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Offen Fair Web Analytics under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Medama and Offen Fair Web Analytics with Docker?

Medama: yes. Offen Fair Web Analytics: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Medama or Offen Fair Web Analytics?

Medama has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Offen Fair Web Analytics. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons