Fathom Lite vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fathom Lite
Simple, open-source website analytics
VS
Offen Fair Web Analytics
Transparent, fair web analytics that respects users
| Feature | Fathom Lite | Offen Fair Web Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,013 | ★ 978 |
| First released | 2018 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Offen Fair Web Analytics if…
- Exceptionally privacy-respecting
- Builds visitor trust
Frequently asked questions
Is Fathom Lite or Offen Fair Web Analytics better?
Fathom Lite is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Offen Fair Web Analytics if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Fathom Lite and Offen Fair Web Analytics free and open-source?
Yes. Fathom Lite is licensed under MIT and Offen Fair Web Analytics under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fathom Lite and Offen Fair Web Analytics with Docker?
Fathom Lite: yes. Offen Fair Web Analytics: yes.
Related comparisons
- Fathom Lite vs Ackee
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Ackee
- Fathom Lite vs Counterscale
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Counterscale
- Fathom Lite vs Countly Community Edition
- Fathom Lite vs Druid
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Druid
- Fathom Lite vs Evidence
- Fathom Lite vs Flagsmith
- Fathom Lite vs GoAccess
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs GoAccess