Counterscale vs Offen Fair Web Analytics
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Counterscale | Offen Fair Web Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | ≈5-minute setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 80 · Excellent | 46 · Fair |
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | one-click, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,148 | ★ 981 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
What are Counterscale and Offen Fair Web Analytics?
Counterscale
Counterscale is a simple, privacy-friendly web analytics tool designed to be easy to deploy and maintain on Cloudflare Workers. It tracks page views and visitors with minimal infrastructure.
- Runs on Cloudflare Workers
- Privacy-friendly tracking
- Minimal infrastructure
- Cheap to operate
Offen Fair Web Analytics
Offen Fair Web Analytics is a privacy-focused analytics tool that gives website operators insights while letting visitors see and delete their own data. It is transparent and consent-based.
- Visitor data transparency
- End-to-end encrypted data
- Consent-based tracking
- Users can delete their data
Counterscale vs Offen Fair Web Analytics: key differences
Counterscale is written in TypeScript, while Offen Fair Web Analytics is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — MIT for Counterscale versus Apache-2.0 for Offen Fair Web Analytics. Counterscale is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Offen Fair Web Analytics. Offen Fair Web Analytics is the more established project (first released 2019), while Counterscale arrived in 2024. Counterscale has the considerably larger community, at 2,148 GitHub stars versus 981. Offen Fair Web Analytics lists first-class Docker deployment; Counterscale does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Counterscale if…
- Almost free to run
- Very easy deployment
Watch out for
- Cloudflare dependency
- Basic feature set
Choose Offen Fair Web Analytics if…
- Exceptionally privacy-respecting
- Builds visitor trust
Watch out for
- Less mainstream
- Consent UI changes metrics
Frequently asked questions
Is Counterscale or Offen Fair Web Analytics better?
Counterscale is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Offen Fair Web Analytics if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Counterscale and Offen Fair Web Analytics free and open-source?
Yes. Counterscale is licensed under MIT and Offen Fair Web Analytics under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Counterscale and Offen Fair Web Analytics with Docker?
Counterscale: check the project docs for container support. Offen Fair Web Analytics: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Counterscale or Offen Fair Web Analytics?
Counterscale has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Offen Fair Web Analytics. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Counterscale vs Ackee
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Ackee
- Counterscale vs Fathom Lite
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Fathom Lite
- Counterscale vs GoatCounter
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs GoatCounter
- Counterscale vs Counter.dev Selfhost
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Counter.dev Selfhost
- Counterscale vs Litlyx
- Offen Fair Web Analytics vs Litlyx