Counter.dev Selfhost vs Medama
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Counter.dev Selfhost
Minimalist privacy-respecting web analytics
VS
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
| Feature | Counter.dev Selfhost | Medama |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,007 | ★ 636 |
| First released | 2020 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Counter.dev Selfhost if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Counter.dev Selfhost or Medama better?
Neither is universally better. Counter.dev Selfhost has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Counter.dev Selfhost and Medama free and open-source?
Yes. Counter.dev Selfhost is licensed under MIT and Medama under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Counter.dev Selfhost and Medama with Docker?
Counter.dev Selfhost: yes. Medama: yes.