Litlyx vs Medama
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Litlyx
AI-powered, privacy-first analytics in a single script
VS
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
| Feature | Litlyx | Medama |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,742 | ★ 636 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Litlyx or Medama better?
Neither is universally better. Litlyx has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Litlyx and Medama free and open-source?
Yes. Litlyx is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Medama under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Litlyx and Medama with Docker?
Litlyx: yes. Medama: yes.