Fathom Lite vs Medama
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fathom Lite
Simple, open-source website analytics
VS
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
| Feature | Fathom Lite | Medama |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,013 | ★ 636 |
| First released | 2018 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Fathom Lite or Medama better?
Neither is universally better. Fathom Lite has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Fathom Lite and Medama free and open-source?
Yes. Fathom Lite is licensed under MIT and Medama under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fathom Lite and Medama with Docker?
Fathom Lite: yes. Medama: yes.