Lufi vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLufiSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguagePerlGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 300★ 87,439
First released20152014
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Lufi if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Perl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Lufi details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lufi or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lufi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Lufi and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Lufi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lufi and Syncthing with Docker?

Lufi: yes. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons