File Browser vs Lufi

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserLufi
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPerl
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 300
First released20172015
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Lufi if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Perl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Lufi details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Lufi better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lufi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Lufi free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Lufi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Lufi with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Lufi: yes.

Related comparisons