FilePizza vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilePizzaSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 10,129★ 87,439
First released20232014
ReplacesWeTransferDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is FilePizza or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are FilePizza and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FilePizza and Syncthing with Docker?

FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons