croc vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 87,439
First released20182014
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Syncthing with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons