SHSelfHostIndex

Restic Cron vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
RE Restic Cron Containerized scheduled restic backup runner VS BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption
FeatureRestic CronBackblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseGPL-3.0
LanguageShellRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 702★ 500
First released20192020
ReplacesBackblazeTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Restic Cron if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
Restic Cron details

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Restic Cron or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?

Neither is universally better. Restic Cron has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Restic Cron and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?

Yes. Restic Cron is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Restic Cron and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?

Restic Cron: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons