Kopia vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kopia
Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Kopia | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,798 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Kopia or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Backup tool nono Plakar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kopia and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kopia and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Kopia: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.