ArchivesSpace vs Kopia
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ArchivesSpace
Archives information management application for managing and providing
VS
Kopia
Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface
| Feature | ArchivesSpace | Kopia |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | ECL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 435 | ★ 13,798 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | Backblaze, Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose ArchivesSpace if…
- Released under the ECL-2.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchivesSpace or Kopia better?
Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ArchivesSpace if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are ArchivesSpace and Kopia free and open-source?
Yes. ArchivesSpace is licensed under ECL-2.0 and Kopia under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ArchivesSpace and Kopia with Docker?
ArchivesSpace: check the project docs for container support. Kopia: yes.