CKAN vs Kopia

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANKopia
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 13,798
First released20262019
ReplacesBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Kopia better?

Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CKAN if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CKAN and Kopia free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Kopia under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Kopia with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Kopia: yes.

Related comparisons