Amanda vs CKAN

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAmandaCKAN
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageCPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 267★ 5,088
First released19912026
ReplacesVeeam, CommVault

Why pick each one

Choose Amanda if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Amanda details

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Frequently asked questions

Is Amanda or CKAN better?

CKAN is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Amanda if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Amanda and CKAN free and open-source?

Yes. Amanda is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and CKAN under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Amanda and CKAN with Docker?

Amanda: check the project docs for container support. CKAN: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons