Bareos vs CKAN

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBareosCKAN
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,232★ 5,088
First released20102026
ReplacesVeeam, CommVault

Why pick each one

Choose Bareos if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Bareos details

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Frequently asked questions

Is Bareos or CKAN better?

CKAN is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Bareos if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Bareos and CKAN free and open-source?

Yes. Bareos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and CKAN under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Bareos and CKAN with Docker?

Bareos: yes. CKAN: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons