BackupPC vs Kopia

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackupPCKopia
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePerlGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 1,621★ 13,798
First released20012019
ReplacesCrashPlan, Time MachineBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose BackupPC if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Perl
BackupPC details

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Frequently asked questions

Is BackupPC or Kopia better?

Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider BackupPC if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are BackupPC and Kopia free and open-source?

Yes. BackupPC is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kopia under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BackupPC and Kopia with Docker?

BackupPC: yes. Kopia: yes.

Related comparisons