Kopia vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kopia
Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface
VS
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption
| Feature | Kopia | Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,798 | ★ 500 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Time Machine, Backblaze |
Why pick each one
Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Kopia or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?
Neither is universally better. Kopia has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kopia and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?
Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kopia and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?
Kopia: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.