Fooocus vs Fooocus-API

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ai image generation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFooocusFooocus-API
CategoryAI Image GenerationAI Image Generation
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM8,192 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 52,089★ 667
First released20232023
ReplacesMidjourneyDALL-E API, Midjourney

Why pick each one

Choose Fooocus if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Fooocus details

Choose Fooocus-API if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
Fooocus-API details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fooocus or Fooocus-API better?

Fooocus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Fooocus-API if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Fooocus and Fooocus-API free and open-source?

Yes. Fooocus is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Fooocus-API under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fooocus and Fooocus-API with Docker?

Fooocus: check the project docs for container support. Fooocus-API: yes.

Related comparisons