ComfyUI vs Fooocus-API
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ai image generation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ComfyUI
Node-based interface for Stable Diffusion image generation
VS
Fooocus-API
Self-hosted REST API for the Fooocus image generator
| Feature | ComfyUI | Fooocus-API |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Image Generation | AI Image Generation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 124,689 | ★ 667 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Midjourney, DALL-E | DALL-E API, Midjourney |
Why pick each one
Choose ComfyUI if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 124.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose Fooocus-API if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is ComfyUI or Fooocus-API better?
Neither is universally better. ComfyUI has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ComfyUI and Fooocus-API free and open-source?
Yes. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Fooocus-API under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ComfyUI and Fooocus-API with Docker?
ComfyUI: yes. Fooocus-API: yes.