Fooocus-API vs stable-diffusion.cpp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ai image generation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFooocus-APIstable-diffusion.cpp
CategoryAI Image GenerationAI Image Generation
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonC++
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM8,192 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 667★ 6,685
First released20232023
ReplacesDALL-E API, MidjourneyMidjourney

Why pick each one

Choose Fooocus-API if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
Fooocus-API details

Choose stable-diffusion.cpp if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 6.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
stable-diffusion.cpp details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fooocus-API or stable-diffusion.cpp better?

Neither is universally better. stable-diffusion.cpp has the larger community, while Fooocus-API is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Fooocus-API and stable-diffusion.cpp free and open-source?

Yes. Fooocus-API is licensed under GPL-3.0 and stable-diffusion.cpp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fooocus-API and stable-diffusion.cpp with Docker?

Fooocus-API: yes. stable-diffusion.cpp: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons