Fooocus vs stable-diffusion.cpp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ai image generation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFooocusstable-diffusion.cpp
CategoryAI Image GenerationAI Image Generation
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonC++
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM8,192 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 52,089★ 6,685
First released20232023
ReplacesMidjourneyMidjourney

Why pick each one

Choose Fooocus if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Fooocus details

Choose stable-diffusion.cpp if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 6.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
stable-diffusion.cpp details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fooocus or stable-diffusion.cpp better?

Fooocus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider stable-diffusion.cpp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Fooocus and stable-diffusion.cpp free and open-source?

Yes. Fooocus is licensed under GPL-3.0 and stable-diffusion.cpp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fooocus and stable-diffusion.cpp with Docker?

Fooocus: check the project docs for container support. stable-diffusion.cpp: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons