Stable Diffusion WebUI vs Fooocus

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ai image generation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureStable Diffusion WebUIFooocus
CategoryAI Image GenerationAI Image Generation
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM8,192 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 164,436★ 52,089
First released20222023
ReplacesMidjourney, DALL-EMidjourney

Why pick each one

Choose Stable Diffusion WebUI if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 164.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Stable Diffusion WebUI details

Choose Fooocus if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Fooocus details

Frequently asked questions

Is Stable Diffusion WebUI or Fooocus better?

Neither is universally better. Stable Diffusion WebUI has the larger community, while Fooocus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Stable Diffusion WebUI and Fooocus free and open-source?

Yes. Stable Diffusion WebUI is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Fooocus under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Stable Diffusion WebUI and Fooocus with Docker?

Stable Diffusion WebUI: yes. Fooocus: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons