FilePizza vs Seafile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
Seafile
High-performance file sync and share with block storage
| Feature | FilePizza | Seafile |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 15,077 |
| First released | 2023 | 2012 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Seafile if…
- Excellent sync performance
- Stable and battle-tested
- Good for large libraries
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or Seafile better?
Neither is universally better. Seafile has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FilePizza and Seafile free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Seafile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and Seafile with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Seafile: yes.