FilePizza vs PsiTransfer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
PsiTransfer
Simple open-source file sharing solution
| Feature | FilePizza | PsiTransfer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 1,920 |
| First released | 2023 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose PsiTransfer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or PsiTransfer better?
Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while PsiTransfer is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FilePizza and PsiTransfer free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and PsiTransfer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and PsiTransfer with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. PsiTransfer: yes.