Kleeja vs PsiTransfer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kleeja
Free upload and file-sharing application
VS
PsiTransfer
Simple open-source file sharing solution
| Feature | Kleeja | PsiTransfer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 193 | ★ 1,920 |
| First released | 2006 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Kleeja if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose PsiTransfer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Kleeja or PsiTransfer better?
Neither is universally better. PsiTransfer has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kleeja and PsiTransfer free and open-source?
Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PsiTransfer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kleeja and PsiTransfer with Docker?
Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. PsiTransfer: yes.