FilePizza vs ProjectSend
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
ProjectSend
Self-hosted client-oriented file sharing
| Feature | FilePizza | ProjectSend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 1,958 |
| First released | 2023 | 2012 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | Dropbox, WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose ProjectSend if…
- Great for client deliverables
- Simple to operate
- Clear access control
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or ProjectSend better?
Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while ProjectSend is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FilePizza and ProjectSend free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and ProjectSend under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and ProjectSend with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. ProjectSend: yes.