Kleeja vs ProjectSend
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kleeja
Free upload and file-sharing application
VS
ProjectSend
Self-hosted client-oriented file sharing
| Feature | Kleeja | ProjectSend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 193 | ★ 1,958 |
| First released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | Dropbox, WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Kleeja if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose ProjectSend if…
- Great for client deliverables
- Simple to operate
- Clear access control
Frequently asked questions
Is Kleeja or ProjectSend better?
Neither is universally better. ProjectSend has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kleeja and ProjectSend free and open-source?
Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ProjectSend under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kleeja and ProjectSend with Docker?
Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. ProjectSend: yes.