Duplicati vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Duplicati | Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,020 | ★ 500 |
| First released | 2008 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Time Machine, Backblaze |
What are Duplicati and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone?
Duplicati
Duplicati is free backup software that stores encrypted, incremental backups to cloud and local destinations through a web interface. It targets users who want scheduled GUI-driven backups. It is deployed via Docker or installers.
- Web-based backup management
- Encrypted incremental backups
- Many cloud storage targets
- Scheduling built in
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
Pika Backup is a simple desktop backup application for GNOME built on BorgBackup. It focuses on protecting personal data with encrypted, deduplicated, and compressed backups.
- GNOME desktop backup app
- Encrypted Borg archives
- Simple scheduling
Duplicati vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: key differences
Duplicati is written in C#, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is built with Rust. Licensing differs — MIT for Duplicati versus GPL-3.0 for Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone. Duplicati is the more established project (first released 2008), while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone arrived in 2020. Duplicati has the considerably larger community, at 15,020 GitHub stars versus 500. Duplicati lists first-class Docker deployment; Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Duplicati if…
- Friendly GUI
- Broad storage support
- Free
Watch out for
- Restores can be slow
- Long beta history
Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?
Neither is universally better. Duplicati has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Duplicati and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Duplicati vs Autorestic
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Autorestic
- Duplicati vs Backrest
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Backrest
- Duplicati vs Backup tool nono Plakar
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Backup tool nono Plakar
- Duplicati vs BorgBackup
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs BorgBackup
- Duplicati vs borgmatic
- Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs borgmatic