Dufs vs SparkleShare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dufs
Distinctive utility file server with WebDAV support
VS
SparkleShare
Git-backed file synchronization with version history
| Feature | Dufs | SparkleShare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,562 | ★ 4,971 |
| First released | 2022 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose Dufs if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Dufs or SparkleShare better?
Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SparkleShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dufs and SparkleShare free and open-source?
Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dufs and SparkleShare with Docker?
Dufs: yes. SparkleShare: check the project docs for container support.