mitmproxy vs DDNS-Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
DDNS-Go
Automatic dynamic DNS updater with a web interface
| Feature | mitmproxy | DDNS-Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 17,177 |
| First released | 2010 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | No-IP, DynDNS |
Why pick each one
Choose DDNS-Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or DDNS-Go better?
Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are mitmproxy and DDNS-Go free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and DDNS-Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and DDNS-Go with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. DDNS-Go: yes.