Anubis vs DDNS-Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAnubisDDNS-Go
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 21,230★ 17,177
First released20252020
ReplacesCloudflare Bot ManagementNo-IP, DynDNS

Why pick each one

Choose Anubis if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 21.2k GitHub stars
Anubis details

Choose DDNS-Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
DDNS-Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Anubis or DDNS-Go better?

Neither is universally better. Anubis has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Anubis and DDNS-Go free and open-source?

Yes. Anubis is licensed under MIT and DDNS-Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Anubis and DDNS-Go with Docker?

Anubis: yes. DDNS-Go: yes.

Related comparisons