Apache APISIX vs DDNS-Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApache APISIXDDNS-Go
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageLuaGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,968★ 17,177
First released20192020
ReplacesKong, AWS API GatewayNo-IP, DynDNS

Why pick each one

Choose Apache APISIX if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 17k GitHub stars
Apache APISIX details

Choose DDNS-Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
DDNS-Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache APISIX or DDNS-Go better?

DDNS-Go is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Apache APISIX if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Apache APISIX and DDNS-Go free and open-source?

Yes. Apache APISIX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and DDNS-Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apache APISIX and DDNS-Go with Docker?

Apache APISIX: yes. DDNS-Go: yes.

Related comparisons