authentik vs DDNS-Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
authentik
Open-source identity provider with proxy outpost
VS
DDNS-Go
Automatic dynamic DNS updater with a web interface
| Feature | authentik | DDNS-Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,666 | ★ 17,177 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | No-IP, DynDNS |
Why pick each one
Choose authentik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 23.7k GitHub stars
Choose DDNS-Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 17.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is authentik or DDNS-Go better?
Neither is universally better. authentik has the larger community, while DDNS-Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are authentik and DDNS-Go free and open-source?
Yes. authentik is licensed under MIT and DDNS-Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run authentik and DDNS-Go with Docker?
authentik: yes. DDNS-Go: yes.